Health for all not without madness of each
(in light psychoanalysis)
11 and June 12, 2011
Rio de Janeiro
Towards V No. 1 ENAPOL 6
Dear colleagues, published in this issue interesting contributions sent to us Laion Adriana, Olga Molina, Adriana Testa and Francis Hugo Freda. You see, a great closing, since this number 16 we end the series that began in December last year and was made not without support and enthusiasm of many colleagues. Our thanks go to them, and whose contributions have made, each with its style, the resonances that everyone has had the issue before us, and we take Rio de Janeiro next June.
I remember visiting the website of ENAPOL ( www.ebp.org.br / enapol ) where you will find all information relating to the Meeting.
Sincerely,
Fernando Vitale
Scientific Secretariat-EOL ENAPOL
Marina Recalde
CTEDENAPOL-EOL
Organizing Committee in Argentina :
Marina Recalde (Executive Dir) Fernando Vitale (Sec.Científica) Alejandra Breglia (Treasury and Registration), Alejandra Glaze (Library), Viviana Mozzi (Web).
Links to Sections : Roxana
Chiatti (Section Córdoba), Elvira Dianno (Section Santa Fe), Daniel Perretta (Section Rosario)
Translations: Flávia Seidinger
CONTRIBUTION OF HUGO FRANCISCO FREDA
Health for all not without madness of each
(in the light of psychoanalysis)
The title, very well chosen, obviously, deserves an interpretation.
first level of interpretation:
What is it? The tension between the 'whole' and 'one'. That is, the tension between the multiple and the one. This relationship is very old, occupied a part of thought fundamentally philosophical and religious. Obviously, after Descartes, the relationship between the general and particular acquired another signification.
However, the title does not stop at a general reflection on these two poles, but the limited to pointing out that this tension should be studied or understood in "the light of psychoanalysis."
psychoanalysis How did the tension between 'universal' and 'particular' (the whole and the one)? First instead, led to Freud called universal concepts. There are several, but retain three: The Oedipus complex and their forms of articulation between the sexes, the sex and cause of all symptoms and order drive as an inherent and irreducible in humans.
For psychoanalysis, the particular is the psychoanalytic interpretation. There is "a general theory of interpretation." Psychoanalysis did not create a hermeneutics, produced no standard interpretation, but it does depend on "the act" psychoanalytic "the desire of the psychoanalyst."
Second interpretation: the term "health" in the light of psychoanalysis.
Health is not a psychoanalytic term itself. Comes in medicine and had, at one point in history, a close relationship with religion and philosophical thought.
an idea of health as harmony between body and soul is present from the Greeks and currently thousands of manifestations.
The beginning of psychoanalysis is marked by the treatment of physical symptoms from the floor. Freud talks about the anatomy typical of hysteria and even states that the majority of patients presenting to the analysis suffer from physical problems related to sexuality (frigidity in women, impotence and premature ejaculation in men). Defined the self as a "body surface" and linked the drive to order body orifices. We could go all the theory and could say, from a certain perspective, that for Freud, psychoanalysis is the body, invented a body, because it defined using an equation: the place of enjoyment and sexual satisfaction, where the anatomical difference between the sexes, ie, castration, what it means.
Indeed, the mind-body division was destroyed from Freud and psychoanalysis that from the body and their avatars that defines the subject. Juanito's case demonstrates.
Health for Freud, from this viewpoint, is the functioning of the body without the weight of the symptom. It was Freud who released the body of religious significance, making it a place of registration and sexual positions a subjective choice. The analytical work exposes the body to the work of significance for each subject can be found from there "his name."
Lacan elaborated on this narrow passageway from the body to be and return from the seminar " Encore," which it can be read 'a - body "(a corp.) The "one body" is one of the definitions be.
And finally, let's not forget history, totalitarian regimes first thing they do is to regulate the movement of bodies in space.
CONTRIBUTION OF OLGA G. DE MOLINA
"Language and Style"
Roland Barthes writes about the language describing it as a nature slips through a word of the writer who tries to shape his style.
Pictures, personal mythology, the homophonies forgotten behind the glass of the language are part of the baggage of who dresses like that are his subject, which resonates in the body of the subject that takes the place of word.
Beyond the form and style, even the most refined, with which the author enters the language, there is something in it to resist the sense that the writer hopes to rescue the structure of the text.
WithLacan psychoanalysis gave way to the point that the real troumatismo to be speaking the language, not only while it is not enough to say about reality, but because her tongue, not say that the relationship can be written sex.
why the unconscious is structured like a language, is a vagary of the language to know about a subject that gives his style.
between what comes from the language and the subject who inhabits it is a relationship, for R Barthes, this relationship is drawn between the horizon and verticality of language and style is a space which houses the formal reality of writing.
instead Psychoanalysis tells us that between language and style, it creates another script, the symptom. The symptom as a function of writing because it occupies the place where it ceases to be written and where it articulates what comes from the tongue, while the style is what gives the most singular form kneading the subject, which is of more real your enjoyment.
Freud sought in their neurotic beyond memories forgotten the value of reminiscence because that is where the drive takes shape at the edges, in the marks left by the time of enjoyment. Among
and style reminiscent of homology is a relationship, both are as untranslatable as the proper name and both are unique to the madness of each knotting the symptom.
Style is the man, and Lacan introduces Overture Writings I, a little later wondered if the man we went and answered that is the subject who answered the question on.
The obsjeto, who writes with a different spelling in the seminar 23, to show that it is the same bone which reduces the object to a letter to . Letter shows the intrusion of writing that comes from anywhere other than the significant. Is the response which serves to hold the style in a particular way of writing for R Barthes, in literature, will The zero degree of writing . (1) and in psychoanalysis is the unique way a subject of invent a new relationship with its history, reminiscences, sinthome with in its own name.
The rest is left as a subject of enjoyment where waste has escaped the tyranny of memory and passed through the screen of the symptom, what remains is the style, as unique as its symptom, robbed joyful footprints of history that will have been, to build a place in the social bond.
The style of a subject resisting paratodos mental health shelter in each of its singular madness sinthome.
(1) Roland Barthes The zero degree of writing Siglo XXI Edit
CONTRIBUTION OF ADRIANA Lajen
"The ideal of the return of the parental bond vs. the madness of each "
A 6 year old girl, the youngest of four brothers, meets with the analysis at the request of the judicial branch. She has already brought a solution, its particular invention, in which guides and supports their social bond, "her family are her brothers."
This child remained with firmness and determination that this solution could hold in the analysis and that he sought a paradoxical satisfaction.
But the judicial insistence was such that after several years of analysis, found a chance to put his voice she go tell the judge the reasons for his decision "does not want to see your father." So could from his desire "to locate a particular say in the field of law" [1] , convincing the judge to insist no more on the restoration of an impossible relationship to her.
Whenever we get more claims arising from right field to treat the return of the father-son bond that justice itself has been discontinued because of abuse, mistreatment, etc, but after a while and having "punished" the culprit is assumed that the "best" that can happen to that child is to restore the filial relationship.
This presumption is based on an ideal family and children's rights to have a relationship with his father, a right for all, as this speech has benefits for mental health of children.
From psychoanalysis hold Laurent Eric reminds us that "the impact on the unconscious of the subject matter the father is not limited to consideration of their legal status " [2] .
If we understand madness as an original way of addressing the language, so the subject is conditioned to become an inventor, the practice of psychoanalysis involves listening to how, given the limits stated above, each child from real in play that involves an encounter with an abusive father, bad handler, etc., sintomatizar that contingency.
That solution turned-invention singular is a way of enjoyment that can only accommodate the analytic discourse.
CONTRIBUTION OF ADRIANA TESTA
"Notes on an experience as possible"
Referring to the "Man Without Qualities by Robert Musil, Juan José Saer defined the role of writer as guardian as possible, that is the place that it is concerned in a world governed by the "planning paranoid." Saer himself makes a comparison with the function of psychoanalysis to warn that any analysis of narrative construction, the benchmark system in play is what Freud called "in the case of hallucinations, the fragment of historical truth that underlies and makes for the sick, credible "( The concept of fiction, 1973).
In the early decades of last century, before the dizzying world engineering, Musil writes, "We won the reality and lost sleep. (...) Is exactly as if the old and unfit humanity was asleep on a mound and nine were to wake up with ants in the blood. " "Frantic animal itching of industry." "The math is mixed like a demon in all facets of life."
Psychoanalysis, its practice, its role in the world today is indebted to this novel, which prophesied the disenchantment a man reduced to statistical calculation under the domination of the number one (master-signifier in its purest form but also stupid) [1] . 'Ants in the blood', 'frenzied ceaseless itch', 'mathematical devilish' are metaphors that do exist in the incessant writing Musil way possible, seeking "a sense of reality" in relation to a real truth but as "fiction problem."
Also, the individual myth as a form of discourse that shies away from objective truth, was the building that Lacan proposed, from Freud's family romance and the symbolic effectiveness of the myth of Levi-Strauss, to treat historical truth ( always fantasy) of an individual in relation to actual experience and passion with an analyst. Only an event of this nature can protect a possible truth about the conditions of enjoyment that indict the "drama", "epic" or "sort of near delirium" [2] resulting from the combination ghost myth.
[1] Jacques-Alain Miller: "Truth, probability statistics, the real," pp. 155-164, in Lacanian psychoanalysis Journal 2. Publication of the School of Lacanian orientation. Buenos Aires. 2004.
2 Jacques Lacan: "The neurotic's individual myth" (1953), in speeches and texts . Spring. Buenos Aires, 1985, pp. 48 and 49.
0 comments:
Post a Comment